[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200804111344.09226.inaky@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:44:08 -0700
From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@...ux.intel.com>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@...il.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] rfkill: add the WWAN radio type
On Friday 11 April 2008, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Unfortunately, instead of adding a generic Wireless WAN type, a technology-
> specific type (WiMAX) was added. That's useless for other WWAN devices,
> such as EDGE, UMTS, X-RTT and other such radios.
>
> Add a WWAN rfkill type for generic wireless WAN devices. No keys are added
> as most devices use KEY_RADIO for WWAN control and need no specific keycode
> added.
I know it is easier to complain than to submit code, but at this
point, shouldn't we make this dynamic? [so that the interested technology
that provides an rfkill switch registers it?].
Something that given a technology name registers a dynamic key and type
number that can be use throughout?
--
Inaky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists