linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4 v2] [RFC] UIO: generic platform driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080411225401.GN3185@local>
Date:	Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:54:02 +0200
From:	"Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...utronix.de>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	Uwe Kleine-K?nig <Uwe.Kleine-Koenig@...i.com>,
	"Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...utronix.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4 v2] [RFC] UIO: generic platform driver

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 02:41:34PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:48:35PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > > +			dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "device has more than "
> > > +					stringify(MAX_UIO_MAPS)
> > This must read __stringify(MAX_UIO_MAPS).  Sorry, I didn't compile test
> > that.
> 
> Care to send the latest version of this, I'm a bit lost as to what
> people want me to apply...

Hi Greg,
PATCH 4/4 still has a problem. It uses some clock framework functions
not available on every architecture. E.g. on x86_64 you can select this
driver in menuconfig, but it won't compile.

The first three patches are OK in my opinion. Uwe provided a second
version of PATCH 1/4, PATCH 2/4 and PATCH 3/4 were alright in their
original version. I added my Signed-off-by to 1-3, but not to 4.

Thanks,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/