[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080411230607.GA12543@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:06:07 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...utronix.de>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Uwe Kleine-K?nig <Uwe.Kleine-Koenig@...i.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4 v2] [RFC] UIO: generic platform driver
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 12:54:02AM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 02:41:34PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:48:35PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > > > + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "device has more than "
> > > > + stringify(MAX_UIO_MAPS)
> > > This must read __stringify(MAX_UIO_MAPS). Sorry, I didn't compile test
> > > that.
> >
> > Care to send the latest version of this, I'm a bit lost as to what
> > people want me to apply...
>
> Hi Greg,
> PATCH 4/4 still has a problem. It uses some clock framework functions
> not available on every architecture. E.g. on x86_64 you can select this
> driver in menuconfig, but it won't compile.
>
> The first three patches are OK in my opinion. Uwe provided a second
> version of PATCH 1/4, PATCH 2/4 and PATCH 3/4 were alright in their
> original version. I added my Signed-off-by to 1-3, but not to 4.
Ok, I grabbed patch 1, 2 and 3 are already in my tree and -mm :)
Let me know if you all come to an agreement on patch 4.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists