lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 12 Apr 2008 08:42:49 -0500 (CDT)
From:	rct@...s.com (Bob Tracy)
To:	Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>
CC:	Bob Tracy <rct@...s.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc7: warn_on_slowpath triggered

Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> On 2008.03.31 03:40:37 +0200, Bj?rn Steinbrink wrote:
> > [Added Ingo and Thomas to Cc:]
> > 
> > On 2008.03.29 17:29:55 -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> > > System is a AMD K6-III/450.  This is actually a 2.6.25-rcX issue
> > > that I'm just getting around to reporting.  Sorry about that...
> > 
> > Not necessarily a regression, it's just that the WARN_ON_ONCE didn't
> > exist yet in 2.6.24.
> 
> Hm, the warnings seem to be a bit broken. They were added in
> 7d409d6057c7244f8757ce15245f6df27271be0c "x86: add some pirq debugging".
> 
> In pirq_via586_{get,set} and pirq_ite_{get,set}, they're missing the
> fact that we're using pirq-1 to index the array. So it's spitting out
> warnings for valid cases. So Bob's warning can very well be completely
> bogus.
> 
> In pirq_ali_{get,set} there's probably the same problem, but I can't
> really tell for sure, because pirq isn't used to index the array
> directly, and the comment above that functions tells me not to guess
> anything.
> 
> For pirq_vlsi_{get,set} I just wondered why that ">= 9" instead of "> 8"
> as it is on the next line, but well, that's just style nit-picking...
> 
> Bj?rn

I've been out of town for the past week and a half, and had no way to
test the "linux/arch/x86/pci/irq.c" patch you provided.  Since this is
still being tracked as an unresolved issue, I guess I need to say "it
fixes the problem for me." Your fix didn't make it into mainline for
2.6.25-rc8, but it applies cleanly and works properly there as well.

Thanks!

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Tracy          |  "I was a beta tester for dirt.  They never did
rct@...s.com       |   get all the bugs out." - Steve McGrew on /.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ