| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20080411212222.b3c1177e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 21:22:22 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2 On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:40:36 +0300 Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:33:54PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > >... > > Changes since 2.6.25-rc8-mm1: > >... > > +ext4-is-busted-on-m68k.patch > > > > ext4 doesn't build on m68k > >... > > Is this due to the generic_find_next_le_bit compile error I reported as > 2.6.25 regression (there seems to be some discussion recently how to > fix it - hopefully for 2.6.25) or is there even more breakage in -mm? Yes, it's the bitops screwup. I saw some related linux-ext4 email float past yesterday, so something might be happening. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists