[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080412184317.GB18122@skywalker>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 00:13:17 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:22:22PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:40:36 +0300 Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:33:54PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >...
> > > Changes since 2.6.25-rc8-mm1:
> > >...
> > > +ext4-is-busted-on-m68k.patch
> > >
> > > ext4 doesn't build on m68k
> > >...
> >
> > Is this due to the generic_find_next_le_bit compile error I reported as
> > 2.6.25 regression (there seems to be some discussion recently how to
> > fix it - hopefully for 2.6.25) or is there even more breakage in -mm?
>
> Yes, it's the bitops screwup.
>
> I saw some related linux-ext4 email float past yesterday, so something
> might be happening.
>
It would really help if we can get some m68k people to look at patch
i posted.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/5944
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists