[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080413190326.GB21204@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:03:26 +0300
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben@...tec.co.uk>, Vincent Sanders <vince@...tec.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] mfd/sm501.c: #if 0 unused functions
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 08:55:21PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 13/04/2008, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote:
> > This patch #if 0's the following unused functions:
> > - sm501_find_clock()
> > - sm501_gpio_get()
> > - sm501_gpio_set()
> >
>
> Hi Adrian,
>
> I know we've discussed this before, but I have to comment on this once more.
>
> Why is it that you seem to prefer adding '#if 0' around blocks of
> unused code instead of removing it outright?
>...
When I removed unused code outright some people complained that they
plan to use it tomorrow or in the next millenium or whenever.
When I #if 0 it other people complain that I should remove it outright.
So whatever I do, there's always someone complaining. ;-)
In this case the code looks as if it might get used at some point in the
future.
But if a maintainer tells me to resend a patch with the code removed
instead of #if 0'ed I'm always glad to do this.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists