lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080413231445.GC15213@spacedout.fries.net>
Date:	Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:14:46 -0500
From:	David Fries <david@...es.net>
To:	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 9/33 replaces 10/35] W1: be able to manually add and remove slaves

===================================================================
This is an update to the previous set of patches, don't merge them
yet.  Some of the context was messed up and I don't expect patch to
apply the updates with the previous set cleanly.  I'll resubmit the
entire set if these updates look good.
===================================================================

w1.c 1.11 1.12 1.14
I'm intending to be working with a static network and run without the
bus searching, but bus searching is currently the only way to add
slave devices.  This allows any slave to be added or removed.  There
is one file for adding and another for removing.  If the files are
read a short comment including the expected serial number format is
returned.

Signed-off-by: David Fries <david@...es.net>
---
 drivers/w1/w1.c |  140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/w1/w1.c b/drivers/w1/w1.c
index 401c56a..4ed661c 100644
--- a/drivers/w1/w1.c
+++ b/drivers/w1/w1.c
@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ module_param_named(slave_ttl, w1_max_slave_ttl, int, 0);
 DEFINE_MUTEX(w1_mlock);
 LIST_HEAD(w1_masters);
 
+static int w1_attach_slave_device(struct w1_master *dev, struct w1_reg_num *rn);
+void w1_slave_detach(struct w1_slave *sl);
+
 static int w1_master_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
 {
 	return 1;
@@ -349,7 +352,8 @@ static ssize_t w1_master_attribute_show_slave_count(struct device *dev, struct d
 	return count;
 }
 
-static ssize_t w1_master_attribute_show_slaves(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+static ssize_t w1_master_attribute_show_slaves(struct device *dev,
+	struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 {
 	struct w1_master *md = dev_to_w1_master(dev);
 	int c = PAGE_SIZE;
@@ -374,6 +378,134 @@ static ssize_t w1_master_attribute_show_slaves(struct device *dev, struct device
 	return PAGE_SIZE - c;
 }
 
+static ssize_t w1_master_attribute_show_add(struct device *dev,
+	struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+	int c = PAGE_SIZE;
+	c -= snprintf(buf+PAGE_SIZE - c, c,
+		"write device id xx-xxxxxxxxxxxx to add slave\n");
+	return PAGE_SIZE - c;
+}
+
+static int w1_atoreg_num(struct device * dev, const char *buf, size_t count,
+	struct w1_reg_num *rn)
+{
+	unsigned int family;
+	u64 id;
+	int i;
+	u64 rn64_le;
+	/* The CRC value isn't read from the user because the sysfs directory
+	 * doesn't include it and most messages from the bus search don't
+	 * print it either.  It would be unreasonable for the user to then
+	 * provide it.
+	 */
+	const char *error_msg="bad slave string format, expecting "
+		"ff-dddddddddddd\n";
+
+	if(buf[2]!='-') {
+		dev_err(dev, "%s", error_msg);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	i=sscanf(buf, "%02x-%012llx", &family, &id);
+	if(i!=2) {
+		dev_err(dev, "%s", error_msg);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	rn->family=family;
+	rn->id=id;
+
+	rn64_le=cpu_to_le64(*(u64*)rn);
+	rn->crc=w1_calc_crc8((u8 *)&rn64_le, 7);
+
+	#if 0
+	dev_info(dev, "With CRC device is %02x.%012llx.%02x.\n",
+		  rn->family, (unsigned long long)rn->id, rn->crc);
+	#endif
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* Searches the slaves in the w1_master and returns a pointer or NULL.
+ * Note: must hold the mutex
+ */
+static struct w1_slave *w1_slave_search_device(struct w1_master *dev,
+	struct w1_reg_num *rn)
+{
+	struct w1_slave *sl;
+	list_for_each_entry(sl, &dev->slist, w1_slave_entry) {
+		if (sl->reg_num.family == rn->family &&
+				sl->reg_num.id == rn->id &&
+				sl->reg_num.crc == rn->crc) {
+			return sl;
+		}
+	}
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static ssize_t w1_master_attribute_store_add(struct device * dev,
+						struct device_attribute *attr,
+						const char * buf, size_t count)
+{
+	struct w1_master *md = dev_to_w1_master(dev);
+	struct w1_reg_num rn;
+	struct w1_slave *sl;
+	ssize_t result=count;
+
+	if(w1_atoreg_num(dev, buf, count, &rn))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&md->mutex);
+	sl=w1_slave_search_device(md, &rn);
+	/* It would be nice to do a targeted search one the one-wire bus
+	 * for the new device to see if it is out there or not.  But the
+	 * current search doesn't support that.
+	 */
+	if(sl) {
+		dev_info(dev, "Device %s already exists\n", sl->name);
+		result=-EINVAL;
+	} else {
+		w1_attach_slave_device(md, &rn);
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&md->mutex);
+
+	return result;
+}
+
+static ssize_t w1_master_attribute_show_remove(struct device *dev,
+	struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+	int c = PAGE_SIZE;
+	c -= snprintf(buf+PAGE_SIZE - c, c,
+		"write device id xx-xxxxxxxxxxxx to remove slave\n");
+	return PAGE_SIZE - c;
+}
+
+static ssize_t w1_master_attribute_store_remove(struct device * dev,
+						struct device_attribute *attr,
+						const char * buf, size_t count)
+{
+	struct w1_master *md = dev_to_w1_master(dev);
+	struct w1_reg_num rn;
+	struct w1_slave *sl;
+	ssize_t result=count;
+
+	if(w1_atoreg_num(dev, buf, count, &rn))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&md->mutex);
+	sl=w1_slave_search_device(md, &rn);
+	if(sl) {
+		w1_slave_detach(sl);
+	} else {
+		dev_info(dev, "Device %02x-%012llx doesn't exists\n", rn.family,
+			(unsigned long long)rn.id);
+		result=-EINVAL;
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&md->mutex);
+
+	return result;
+}
+
 #define W1_MASTER_ATTR_RO(_name, _mode)				\
 	struct device_attribute w1_master_attribute_##_name =	\
 		__ATTR(w1_master_##_name, _mode,		\
@@ -394,6 +526,8 @@ static W1_MASTER_ATTR_RO(timeout, S_IRUGO);
 static W1_MASTER_ATTR_RO(pointer, S_IRUGO);
 static W1_MASTER_ATTR_RW(search, S_IRUGO | S_IWUGO);
 static W1_MASTER_ATTR_RW(pullup, S_IRUGO | S_IWUGO);
+static W1_MASTER_ATTR_RW(add, S_IRUGO | S_IWUGO);
+static W1_MASTER_ATTR_RW(remove, S_IRUGO | S_IWUGO);
 
 static struct attribute *w1_master_default_attrs[] = {
 	&w1_master_attribute_name.attr,
@@ -405,6 +539,8 @@ static struct attribute *w1_master_default_attrs[] = {
 	&w1_master_attribute_pointer.attr,
 	&w1_master_attribute_search.attr,
 	&w1_master_attribute_pullup.attr,
+	&w1_master_attribute_add.attr,
+	&w1_master_attribute_remove.attr,
 	NULL
 };
 
@@ -700,9 +836,7 @@ void w1_reconnect_slaves(struct w1_family *f, int attach)
 
 static void w1_slave_found(struct w1_master *dev, u64 rn)
 {
-	int slave_count;
 	struct w1_slave *sl;
-	struct list_head *ent;
 	struct w1_reg_num *tmp;
 	u64 rn_le = cpu_to_le64(rn);
 
-- 
1.4.4.4

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ