[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080413084536.GB24429@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:45:36 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Nick Andrew <nick@...k-andrew.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: Cleanup prose of Documentation/i386/IO-APIC.txt
* Nick Andrew <nick@...k-andrew.net> wrote:
> I'm doing a couple of cleanups to Documentation/i386/IO-APIC.txt
> and I have a problem with this line, which is supposed to compute
> a sample pirq= kernel parameter:
>
> echo -n pirq=; echo `scanpci | grep T_L | cut -c56-` | sed 's/ /,/g'
>
> The 'scanpci' command used to be part of xutils and/or XFree86.
> Xorg implements "Xorg -scanpci" but the output is different and it won't
> run while X is running.
>
> Firstly I propose using the $( ) construct rather than backticks, since
> it is easier to read:
>
> echo -n pirq=; echo $( scanpci | grep T_L | cut -c56- ) | sed 's/ /,/g'
>
> Inside the backtics, instead of scanpci, I could do:
>
> lspci -v | grep IRQ | sed -e 's/.* IRQ \(\w\+\)/\1/'
>
> Is this an acceptable substitution?
yeah, i guess so.
Btw., that's rather arcane text - do people still have to use pirq= boot
lines to get their boxes to boot?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists