[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200804140937.09915.oliver@neukum.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:37:07 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: benh@...nel.crashing.org
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: Introduce new top level suspend and hibernation callbacks (rev. 8)
Am Montag, 14. April 2008 09:23:36 schrieb Benjamin Herrenschmidt:
>
> On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 08:43 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > If you want to request firmware in a PM callback, which makes a
> > certain
> > sense, as we should move to a comprehensive API, if we change the API
> > at all, we need a model with 3 callbacks.
>
> No. At this pace, we'll find reasons to have 98213674 callbacks and will
> still not be happy.
>
> Prepare() should be the right place to call request_firmware() and if
> that is a problem because of bugs in some USB things, then those bugs
> should be fixed.
This isn't a bug. USB simply needs to be able to register (and deregister)
children to be fully operative. You cannot expect a subsystem to work
while some core services are not available.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists