[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080414080351.GL16163@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:03:51 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Nick Andrew <nick@...k-andrew.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, joe@...ches.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] printk: Remember the message level for multi-line
output
* Nick Andrew <nick@...k-andrew.net> wrote:
> printk: Remember the message level for multi-line output
>
> printk(KERN_ALERT "Danger Will Robinson!\nAlien Approaching!\n");
>
> At present this will result in one message at ALERT level and one at
> the current default message loglevel (e.g. WARNING). This is
> non-intuitive.
>
> Modify vprintk() to remember the message loglevel each time it is
> specified and use it for subsequent lines of output which do not
> specify one, within the same call to printk.
i've applied this too for testing.
but multi-line strings are a bit unclean i think: each message line
should have its separate printk.
will your patch leave the behavior of multiple calls to printk alone?
I.e. if i do:
printk(KERN_ALERT "Danger Will Robinson!\n");
printk("Alien Approaching!\n");
then we'll still get a KERN_ALERT plus a default printk, right? In that
case my earlier observation about this patch is moot and i guess it's
fine to do this.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists