linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1JlJmk-000532-KL@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date:	Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:11:30 +0200
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
CC:	miklos@...redi.hu, dwmw2@...radead.org, hch@...radead.org,
	me@...copeland.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3

> > And I didn't advocate moving
> > ntfs to fuse, still that was done and the resulting filesystem at the
> > moment happens to outperform the kernel one in every respect ;)
> 
> Gad.  Why?

I think mostly because of dedication of the maintainer (Szabolcs
Szakacsits).  I don't claim fuse has a great part in it, except the
obvious advantages of developing in userspace: no kernel crashes,
easier debugging, etc...

And of course it could be ported back to the kernel (ntfs-3g is GPL
too), and that would probably result in even more speedups.  But
that's not a trivial task either.

Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/