linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1208161859.3596.75.camel@skunk.anacadf.mentorg.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:30:59 +0200
From:	Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@...e.fr>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, hch@...radead.org,
	me@...copeland.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3

On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 16:10 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I appear to be the only one who is looking at the whole picture.
> 
> Merging a new filesystem has costs - I don't need to enumerate them.  Do
> the benefits of OMFS exceed them?

Eh you, corporate linux developer, please don't discriminate what's
going in the kernel just because of extra cost. Let linux continue to be
"by the people, for the people" if you see what I mean.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/