[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080414014445.5b4a7b22.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 01:44:45 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@...e.fr>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, hch@...radead.org,
me@...copeland.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:30:59 +0200 Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@...e.fr> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 16:10 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I appear to be the only one who is looking at the whole picture.
> >
> > Merging a new filesystem has costs - I don't need to enumerate them. Do
> > the benefits of OMFS exceed them?
>
> Eh you, corporate linux developer, please don't discriminate what's
> going in the kernel just because of extra cost.
By "cost" I refer to extra developer time spent on maintaining the
filesystem. The most recent example is the write_begin/write_end changes
which took a lot of Nick's time and rather a lot of mine also.
I get to see these costs. I seek to minimise them.
> Let linux continue to be
> "by the people, for the people" if you see what I mean.
"the people" here are those who work on the kernel. We want our time to be
spent as effectively as possible. Sorry if that sounds corporate.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists