linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm1 -- BUG: bad unlock balance detected!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <s5h1w58hgpg.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date:	Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:30:03 +0200
From:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:	Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@...e.fr>
Cc:	Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm1 -- BUG: bad unlock balance detected!

At Thu, 3 Apr 2008 11:58:19 +0200,
Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> 
> [Trimmed CC a bit, add Takashi Iwai]
> Hi,
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 08:19:29AM -0400, Miles Lane wrote:
> > [   48.765906] [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
> > [   48.765912] -------------------------------------
> > [   48.765918] pulseaudio/4277 is trying to release lock
> > (&codec->spdif_mutex) at:
> > [   48.765930] [<c03031b7>] mutex_unlock+0x8/0xa
> > [   48.765945] but there are no more locks to release!
> > [   48.765950]
> > [   48.765952] other info that might help us debug this:
> > [   48.765959] 2 locks held by pulseaudio/4277:
> > [   48.765965]  #0:  (&pcm->open_mutex){--..}, at: [<f89f134b>]
> > snd_pcm_open+0xc1/0x1ba [snd_pcm]
> > [   48.766003]  #1:  (&chip->open_mutex){--..}, at: [<f8b4f13d>]
> > azx_pcm_open+0x36/0x184 [snd_hda_intel]
> > [   48.766057]
> > [   48.766059] stack backtrace:
> > [   48.766066] Pid: 4277, comm: pulseaudio Not tainted 2.6.25-rc8-mm1 #12
> > [   48.766086]  [<c013afc6>] print_unlock_inbalance_bug+0xce/0xd8
> > [   48.766107]  [<c0109e1c>] ? save_stack_trace+0x1d/0x3b
> > [   48.766130]  [<c012f54e>] ? __kernel_text_address+0x1b/0x27
> > [   48.766146]  [<c0104533>] ? dump_trace+0xcd/0xd9
> > [   48.766160]  [<c0109d9e>] ? save_stack_address+0x0/0x2c
> > [   48.766176]  [<c013b80a>] ? find_usage_backwards+0xa4/0xc3
> > [   48.766193]  [<c013cfb5>] lock_release_non_nested+0x84/0x120
> > [   48.766209]  [<c03031b7>] ? mutex_unlock+0x8/0xa
> > [   48.766222]  [<c013d1bb>] lock_release+0x16a/0x199
> > [   48.766238]  [<c0303137>] __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xa9/0x121
> > [   48.766252]  [<c03031b7>] mutex_unlock+0x8/0xa
> > [   48.766263]  [<f8b4ffd8>] snd_hda_multi_out_analog_open+0xd3/0xef
> > [snd_hda_intel]
> The following patch should fix it. The buggy code comes from
> git-alsa-tiwai.patch .
> 
> Regards,
> Frederik

Thanks, applied to ALSA tree now.


Takashi

> 
> 
> diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.c b/sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.c
> index 689d177..a6be6e3 100644
> --- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.c
> +++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.c
> @@ -2665,8 +2665,8 @@ int snd_hda_multi_out_analog_open(struct hda_codec *codec,
>  			if (mout->spdif_maxbps < hinfo->maxbps)
>  				hinfo->maxbps = mout->spdif_maxbps;
>  		}
> +		mutex_unlock(&codec->spdif_mutex);
>  	}
> -	mutex_unlock(&codec->spdif_mutex);
>  	return snd_pcm_hw_constraint_step(substream->runtime, 0,
>  					  SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_CHANNELS, 2);
>  }
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/