[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080414013248.GB30489@hash.localnet>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 21:32:48 -0400
From: Bob Copeland <me@...copeland.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, hch@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 04:10:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:49:20 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > > This filesystem has only 20 users.
>
> None of that means that merging this filesystem is the best decision.
Well, 20 may have been aiming just a tad low. I'd never make it in sales.
Here are the stats from linux-karma.sf.net:
- most recent release, for 2.6.25: 36 downloads since 3/16/08
- # subscribers on mailing list: 39 [1]
- most # of downloads of a given release: 252 (May-Oct 2007) [2]
[1] Some subscribers may not use the FS at all since there is also
software for using the ethernet interface. Both are discussed on
the list.
[2] I doubt that 252 d/ls translates to that many _current_ users; a
year is a long time in consumer electronics. I don't have stats on
unique IPs.
I'm unaware of ReplayTV users - one guy contacted me once and then
disappeared.
> Merging a new filesystem has costs - I don't need to enumerate them. Do
> the benefits of OMFS exceed them?
You guys would know best. I can see both arguments...
--
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists