[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48036649.6000409@freescale.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:12:25 -0500
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
York Sun <yorksun@...escale.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, galak@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Driver for Freescale 8610 and 5121 DIU
Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 04/14/2008 03:45 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
>> Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>
>>> See
>>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/12/375
>> That email is dated 3/12 and those comments are about v1 of the patch. The most
>> recent posted version is v5 and it addresses all these issues. See
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/1/346
>
> Ok, how is the sleep-inside-spinlock in fsl_diu_open resolved? rh_alloc might
> sleep if I still see correctly, do I?
Hmmm... I thought I had an answer to this question, but I checked the patch
again, and it looks like this particular issue hasn't been fixed. rh_alloc can
still sleep. I know we worked on fixing this bug, so I'm not sure why it's
still there.
However, we don't need to call rh_alloc(). The arch/powerpc code has been
updated to remove the need for us to a use an rheap.
Unfortunately, the author of the patch, York, is out this week, so I'll have to
take care of this. It'd be easier to modify rh_alloc() so that it doesn't
sleep, so that's what I'm going to do.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists