linux-kernel - Re: nfs: infinite loop in fcntl(F

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080414170743.GD15950@fieldses.org>
Date:	Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:07:43 -0400
From:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc:	trond.myklebust@....uio.no, eshel@...aden.ibm.com, neilb@...e.de,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nfs: infinite loop in fcntl(F_SETLKW)

On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:13:21AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > > > OK. So the correct fix here should really be applied to fcntl_setlk().
> > > > > There is absolutely no reason why we should be looping at all if the
> > > > > filesystem has a ->lock() method.
> > > > > 
> > > > > In fact, this looping behaviour was introduced recently in commit
> > > > > 7723ec9777d9832849b76475b1a21a2872a40d20.
> > > > 
> > > > Apologies, that was indeed a behavioral change introduced in a commit
> > > > that claimed just to be shuffling code around.
> > > 
> > > Yeah, that patch looks totally wrong.  It's not generally a good idea
> > > to do a loop where the exit condition depends on something you don't
> > > control.  And error values from filesystem methods are typically like
> > > that.  For example with fuse, the error code could come from an
> > > unprivileged userspace process.
> > > 
> > > I didn't realize this aspect of the bug previously, because I
> > > concentrated on the lockd inconsistency.
> > 
> > So, does this patch on its own fix the problem you saw?
> 
> Yes.  With the patch applied, the test program returns "lockf:
> Resource temporarily unavailable" instead of hanging.

OK, thanks!

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/