[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200804142241.11545.oliver@neukum.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:41:08 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM: Introduce new top level suspend and hibernation callbacks (rev. 8)
Am Montag, 14. April 2008 16:49:26 schrieb Alan Stern:
> Now, I don't see what the big deal is here. We all agree that it would
> be nice and appropriate if drivers could do things like
> request_firmware() during prepare(). But for the moment they can't.
> It's not like this is some tremendous hardship -- you aren't going to
> have to rip out all the existing prepare() implementations and rewrite
> them, because they don't exist yet!
True. You cannot request firmware in the current suspend() call either.
Rafael's code is a clear improvement over the existing code. Removal
of the freezer will need a lot of rewriting in any case.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists