linux-kernel - Re: [Fwd: [-mm] Add an owner to the mm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84144f020804141406n7ffd8a89ld1008afc1d541640@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:06:46 +0300
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>, balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	serue@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [-mm] Add an owner to the mm_struct (v9)]

On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>  > >  Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
>  >
>  > Reviewed-by: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
>  >
>  > I'm still not sure when to use Acked-by versus Reviewed-by - is it
>  > just based on the level of scrutiny/review?
>
>  Yes.  Reviewed-by: is a lot stronger that Acked-by:.  I've seen some pretty
>  shocking Acked-by:'s :)

Heh, I hope mine wasn't one. But the point here is that, no, I didn't
review the patch that closely (it's mostly cgroup stuff anyway) but I
do want to see struct mm_struct ->owner in the kernel for revoke thus
Acked-by.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/