linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch] xtensa: don't offer PARPORT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080414223409.5ae3271c@core>
Date:	Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:34:09 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Rogan Dawes <lists@...es.za.net>
Cc:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, chris@...kel.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] xtensa: don't offer PARPORT_PC

> Pardon a possibly stupid question here, but would it not make more sense 
> to code the architectures for which these various devices *are* 
> possible, rather than requiring each architecture to go through the 
> entire config file and add their own "we don't do this" for many entries?

For any with PCI bus the right fix is to add the header files.
-- 
--
	"Alan, I'm getting a bit worried about you."
				-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/