[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440804150123u5ddc4449sfa97538fe3970149@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:23:32 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>,
"Ayaz Abdulla" <aabdulla@...dia.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: regression caused by: genirq: do not leave interupts enabled on free_irq
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:17 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
> > > Do we think it's a bug in the RHEL 5.1 kernel? Even so, that's a
> > > problem for the 2.6.25 kernel.
> >
> > it is RHEL 5.1 kernel problem, it has code for maskbit with msi there,
> > but that does work...
typo: should be "that does *not* work"
>
> addendum - basically the argument is: we should kexec conservatively -
> i.e. we should leave as few assumptions and hw changes around as
> possible. So restoring the MSI state is fair enough as a robustness fix,
> even though only kexec to older kernels is affected.
i keep using kexec back and forth to avoid BIOS post stage.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists