[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <517f3f820804150254w491cdf85s28f1d15696db8d96@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:54:18 +0200
From: "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To: "David Newall" <davidn@...idnewall.com>
Cc: "James Morris" <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Al Viro" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Willy Tarreau" <w@....eu>, david@...g.hm,
"Stephen Clark" <sclark46@...thlink.net>,
"Evgeniy Polyakov" <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"Tilman Schmidt" <tilman@...p.cc>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
"Mark Lord" <lkml@....ca>, "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
jesper.juhl@...il.com, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, jeff@...zik.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, git@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Reporting bugs and bisection
On 4/15/08, David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com> wrote:
> James Morris wrote:
> > I don't know how to solve this, but suspect that encouraging the use of
> > reviewed-by and also including it in things like analysis of who is
> > contributing, selection for kernel summit invitations etc. would be a
> > start. At least, better than nothing.
>
> Would it be hard to keep count of the number of errors introduced by
> author and reviewer?
I've found quite a few errors in kernel-userland APIs, but I'm not
sure that this sort of negative statistic would be helpful -- e.g.,
more productive developers probably also introduce more errors.
--
I'll likely only see replies if they are CCed to mtk.manpages at gmail dot com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists