[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080415115924.GA1550@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:59:24 +0400
From: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Vitaliy Gusev <vgusev@...nvz.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH][NET] Fix never pruned tcp out-of-order queue
Hello!
> I still think the guards are pretty much the same as before, sorry:)
Guards inside tcp_prune_queue() are the same exactly.
But the patch adds the second point where out-of-order queue is discarded.
It is when the socket is under rcvbuf, but nevertheless skb cannot
be queued due to system-wide limit. In that case out-of-order queue
is dropped and the limits are rechecked.
> But why not repeat the whole prune for all cases in this case then?
Collapsing and tuning rcv_ssthresh was done once, they are not guarded
by rcvbuf check. So, repeating those steps would be useless.
The only thing is:
> e.g. you should probably at least repeat the third step (setting
> pred_flags to 0) too.
Formally, this is correct. But this is not necessary, pred_flags reset
is redundant even in the first place. The fast path is not so fast,
memory limit is checked explicitly there.
The patch is not perfect. F.e. tcp_prune_ofo_queue() could see empty
out-of-order queue, in this case the second sk_stream_rmem_schedule()
is useless and could be skipped. But it is the second order effect.
I think this will work.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists