linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/3] wm97xx-core: Only schedule interrupt handler if not already scheduled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:47:06 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc:	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] wm97xx-core: Only schedule interrupt handler if not already scheduled

As well as clarifying the fact that the driver can cope if a second
interrupt occurs before the IRQ work is scheduled this also ensures
that calls to the machine irq_enable() are balanced, making that easier
to implement.  Normally this is redundant due to the interrupt disabling
but some unusal board configurations can trigger it.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
 drivers/input/touchscreen/wm97xx-core.c |   14 +++++++-------
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/wm97xx-core.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/wm97xx-core.c
index 2910999..e27b1e0 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/wm97xx-core.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/wm97xx-core.c
@@ -328,18 +328,18 @@ static void wm97xx_pen_irq_worker(struct work_struct *work)
  *
  * We have to disable the codec interrupt in the handler because it
  * can take upto 1ms to clear the interrupt source. We schedule a task
- * in a work queue to do the actual interaction with the chip (it
- * doesn't matter if we end up reenqueing it before it is executed
- * since we don't touch the chip until it has run).  The interrupt is
- * then enabled again in the slow handler when the source has been
- * cleared.
+ * in a work queue to do the actual interaction with the chip.  The
+ * interrupt is then enabled again in the slow handler when the source
+ * has been cleared.
  */
 static irqreturn_t wm97xx_pen_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
 	struct wm97xx *wm = dev_id;
 
-	wm->mach_ops->irq_enable(wm, 0);
-	queue_work(wm->ts_workq, &wm->pen_event_work);
+	if (!work_pending(&wm->pen_event_work)) {
+		wm->mach_ops->irq_enable(wm, 0);
+		queue_work(wm->ts_workq, &wm->pen_event_work);
+	}
 
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
-- 
1.5.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/