[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080415162533.GA7354@localhost.ift.unesp.br>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:25:33 -0300
From: "Carlos R. Mafra" <crmafra2@...il.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@....de>
Subject: Re: [Bug #10117] 2.6.25-current-git sometimes hangs on boot -
dual-core Sony Vaio
On Sun 13.Apr'08 at 17:25:45 -0300, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> On Sun 13.Apr'08 at 20:56:41 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.24. Please verify if it still should be listed.
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10117
> > Subject : 2.6.25-current-git sometimes hangs on boot - dual-core Sony Vaio
> > Submitter : Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@....de>
> > Date : 2008-02-23 18:55 (51 days old)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/23/263
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/4/41
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/9/69
>
> Soeren said it no longer happens to him in http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/9/53
> but unfortunately it still happens with me using -rc9. So I kidnapped his
> bugzilla report :-)
>
> In the bugzilla entry I said earlier today that "hpet=disable" apparently
> makes the problem go away (42 boots OK so far, whereas without this
> boot option it hangs ~90% using vga=6 and ~10% using vga=0x0364)
>
> I tried to bisect it, but sometimes in pre 2.6.25-rc1 kernels it takes
> 30 boots before the first hang to occur. So bisection is not reliable...
>
> If someone proposes a patch I will be glad to test it!
>
> PS: The similar bug in buzilla 10377 also appears to be "fixed"
> by using hpet=disable, see comment #17 in that bug.
>From what Mark Lord said in his comments #33 to #35 in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10117
it appears that this is a much older regression, from april 2007.
So this is a regression, but not from 2.6.24 (although somehow
it never hit me before). I don't know about the policy of closing
regressions that come from way before the previous kernel version,
if there is any. Then I will let you manage the bugzilla #10117
as you see fit (but I will be "there" to hopefuly test any
proposed patches).
Thanks,
Carlos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists