lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4804D228.3090406@fe.uni-lj.si>
Date:	Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:04:56 +0200
From:	Janez Pers <janez.pers@...uni-lj.si>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: shmat/shmdt penalty

Hi all,

Is there significant penalty for doing shmat/shmdt to a preexisting/
pre-created shared memory segment 60-200 times a second in multiple
processes using a modern (2.6) linux kernel on i386 architecture?

Specifically, do I risk:

* significant slowdown due to context switching (e.g. more than 10%)?
* memory fragmentation (?)
* any other resource exhaustion if such code runs for hours?
* scorn and laughter by people who read my code?

Sorry if this is faq or documented anywhere (I could not find it) - then
the pointer/url to the relevant literature will be enough.

Regards,

Janez.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ