linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080415165727.GA8783@infradead.org>
Date:	Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:57:27 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, hch@...radead.org,
	me@...copeland.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 06:16:43PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> We are talking about a filesystem even Christoph considers OK.
> 
> And who asked about the costs of merging crap like 
> drivers/infiniband/hw/nes/ ?
> 
> Speaking about the latter, with Linus' logic one might argue that OMFS 
> must not be rejected since it adds support for some hardware...

Excatly.  I find it very strange to even consider rejecting a rather
small and very well written driver for let's say "political" reasons.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/