[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0804151010500.2879@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Yinghai.Lu@....com
Subject: Re: [bug] SLUB + mm/slab.c boot crash in -rc9
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> btw., now with a second full day spent on this regression, i have
> figured out a workaround the hard way: increasing SECTION_SIZE_BITS in
> include/asm-x86/sparsemem.h from 26 to 27 makes it go away.
Interesting.
I wonder..
So since you don't have NUMA, you have NODES_SHIFT == 0.
That in turn means that NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS is _not_ set.
That, in turn, means that ZONEID_SHIFT does *not* contain SECTIONS_SHIFT.
Is that really what is supposed to happen?
Because then "page_is_buddy()" will not even test the section, as far as I
can tell.
But I'm probably missing something. Why would we not need to test the
section in page_zone_id() when the node ID is in the page flags (but has
zero size)?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists