[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080415124231.e22df79e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:42:31 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Add default CPU topology information
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:44:13 +0100
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:
> Not all architectures and configurations define CPU topology information.
> This can result in an empty topology directory in sysfs, and requires
> in-kernel users to protect all uses with #ifdef - see
> <http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=120639033904472&w=2>.
>
> The documentation of CPU topology specifies what the defaults should be
> if only partial information is available from the hardware. So we can
> provide these defaults as a fallback.
>
> This patch:
>
> - Adds default definitions of the 4 topology macros to
> include/asm-generic/topology.h.
> - Changes include/asm-*/topology.h to include <asm-generic/topology.h>
> unconditionally.
> - Changes drivers/base/topology.c to use the topology macros unconditionally
> and to cope with definitions that aren't lvalues.
> - Updates documentation accordingly.
>
I ran away in terror when I saw this patch. It's dark and dirty stuff
you're unearthing there and it looks like a minefield of compilation
problems. Not aided by the fact that we don't have a topology maintainer
afaik.
We shall see.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists