| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080415224849.GA14592@elte.hu> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:48:49 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: lkml@....ca, jesper.juhl@...il.com, tilman@...p.cc, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, jeff@...zik.org, rjw@...k.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: about bisections * David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote: > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> > Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:53:06 +0200 > > > but please do _not_ require it from testers and users. > > I don't. I ask for a bisection when it is appropriate and I think > other avenues will not bear fruit in a reasonable amount of time. i'm glad i misunderstood you. My impression from reading this thread was that you preferred reporters who do bisection (which is fine so far), to the level of sometimes ignoring reporters who dont (which is not). > Thanks for the arbitrary diatribe about my contributions over the > years and accusations that I have some kind of monopoly over the > networking code and fixes to it. I really appreciate that. you certainly do have a fair amount of exclusivity in determining the dosage of networking commits. Dont get me wrong, you earned it and you deserve it - not the least because you do it best. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists