[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080415122220.748834b7.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:22:20 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"xemul@...nvz.org" <xemul@...nvz.org>, menage@...gle.com,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] use vmalloc for mem_cgroup allocation. v2
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:14:24 +0800
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:17:30 -0700
> > Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >> Well... vmalloced memory is of course a little slower to use - additional
> >> TLB pressure.
> >>
> >> Do you think the memcgroup is accessed frequently enough to use vmalloc()
> >> only on those architectures which actually need it?
> >>
> >> Because it'd be pretty simple to implement:
> >>
> >> if (sizeof(struct mem_group) > PAGE_SIZE)
> >> vmalloc()
> >> else
> >> kmalloc()
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >> if (sizeof(struct mem_group) > PAGE_SIZE)
> >> vfree()
> >> else
> >> kfree()
> >>
> >> the compiler will optimise away the `if'.
> >>
> >
> > Hmm, ok. I'll rewrite one to do that.
> >
>
> It will be better to use wrappers for these: mem_cgroup_alloc() and mem_cgroup_free()
>
yes. will do
-Kame
> > Thanks,
> > -Kame
> >
> >
> >
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists