[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440804150004w1c94b2dci520e0ffb8b60632f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:04:03 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@...urebad.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Yasunori Goto" <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>,
"KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] bootmem: Node-setup agnostic free_bootmem()
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:56:57 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>
> > Johannes Weiner <hannes@...urebad.de> writes:
> >
> > > Make free_bootmem() look up the node holding the specified address
> > > range which lets it work transparently on single-node and multi-node
> > > configurations.
> >
> > Acked-by: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
> >
> > This is far better than the original change it replaces and which
> > I also objected to in review.
> >
>
> So... do we think these two patches are sufficiently safe and important for
> 2.6.25?
the patch is wrong
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists