[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080416095009.GA28629@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:50:09 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Sebastian Siewior <linux-crypto@...breakpoint.cc>,
"Adam J. Richter" <adam@...drasil.com>,
Alexander Kjeldaas <astor@...t.no>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation optimization
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:23:04AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> It would be also quite possible to use two different implementations,
> one for AMD another for Intel. crypto frame work should have no
> problems dealing with that.
Yes that would definitely be an option.
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists