[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1Jm4Ng-0000su-2j@be1.7eggert.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:56:43 +0200
From: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>
To: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@....ac.uk>,
Szabolcs Szakacsits <szaka@...s-3g.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, dwmw2@...radead.org,
hch@...radead.org, me@...copeland.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@....ac.uk> wrote:
> On 14 Apr 2008, at 13:46, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
>>> (and under no-one I include the OOM killer for example!)
>>
>> The OOM killer can be configured and if the fs still uses too much
>> memory
>> then probably it's better to be killed/restarted with journaling
>> support.
>> The important here would be the kernel finally fixing the non-sync
>> behavior
>> when it clams to do so (see recent kernel threads).
>
> You don't get the point. Any process in the system can be using too
> much memory and trigger the OOM killer even when the FS is behaving
> just fine...
Just set /proc/$pid/oom_adj to -17.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists