[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1Jm4ms-0000uH-Ol@be1.7eggert.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:22:46 +0200
From: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replace completions with semaphores
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>> For me it sounds like you just want to rename semaphores to some other
>> name that people don't use them for normal locking?
>
> Would it really be a good idea to give a synchronization concept that
> behaves exactly like a semaphore another name than "semaphore" ? The
> semaphore concept is well known and is taught in every computer
> science course.
What about calling it counting_semaphore, if it's to be used for this purpose?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists