[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200804161413.05869.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:13:04 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, david@...g.hm,
Stephen Clark <sclark46@...thlink.net>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
jesper.juhl@...il.com, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, jeff@...zik.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, git@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: Reporting bugs and bisection
On Wednesday, 16 of April 2008, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:04:59PM +0930, David Newall wrote:
> > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Well, even if someone introduces bugs relatively frequently, but then also
> > > works with the reporters and fixes the bugs timely, it's about okay IMO.
> > >
> > This really is not okay. Even if bugs are fixed a version or two later,
> > the impact those bugs have on users makes the system look bad and drives
> > them away. We do not, I believe, want Linux to top the list for "most
> > bugs". It's unprofessional, unreliable and quite undesirable.
>
> that's what -rc are for, and it's unprofessional to use them in production :-)
Exactly.
And BTW, by saying "timely" I meant "in -rc" or "before the next major release".
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists