[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080415173534.b746f8da.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:35:34 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>
Cc: andi-suse@...stfloor.org, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de,
markus.t.metzger@...el.com, markus.t.metzger@...il.com,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, roland@...hat.com,
mtk.manpages@...il.com, eranian@...glemail.com,
juan.villacis@...el.com
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] x86, ptrace: PEBS support
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 11:01:58 +0200
Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@...el.com> wrote:
> +static inline void *ds_allocate_buffer(size_t size, unsigned int *pages)
> {
> - (*(unsigned long *)(base + ds_cfg.bts_interrupt_threshold.offset)) = value;
> + unsigned long rlim, vm, pgsz;
> + void *buffer;
> +
> + pgsz = PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> + rlim = current->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_AS].rlim_cur >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + vm = current->mm->total_vm + pgsz;
> + if (rlim < vm)
> + return 0;
> +
> + rlim = current->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_MEMLOCK].rlim_cur >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + vm = current->mm->locked_vm + pgsz;
> + if (rlim < vm)
> + return 0;
Should we skip the RLIMIT_MEMLOCK check if capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)?
It's a fairly large patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists