linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Replace completions with semaphores

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:47:55 -0700
From:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc:	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
	Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replace completions with semaphores

 > The cookies aren't checked by the kcounter implementation if
 > CONFIG_DEBUG_KCOUNTER isn't set.  So you can avoid storing them if it's
 > *really* that important to shrink your data structures.

I guess if anyone cared we could have something analogous to
DECLARE_PCI_UNMAP_ADDR() et al that compiles to nothing if
CONFIG_DEBUG_KCOUNTER isn't set.  But I'm not sure it's worth it.
Certainly for the mthca/mlx4 cases of semaphore use there's no problem
holding onto a cookie.

 - R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/