linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch] proper prototypes for mmc_attach

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080416175847.GO1677@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Date:	Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:58:47 +0300
From:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To:	Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] proper prototypes for mmc_attach_*()

On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 07:32:15PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 21:15:50 +0300
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > This patch adds proper prototypes for mmc_attach_*() in 
> > drivers/mmc/core/core.h
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
> > 
> 
> I'm not entirely convinced about these, but seems they seem to bother
> you... ;)

With proper prototypes in a header gcc can check that caller and callee 
agree about the function signature.

Otherwise someone might accidentally change only one of them.

That's a rare issue, but when it happens it's a nasty runtime error.

>      -- Pierre Ossman

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/