[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804162110070.19171@sbz-30.cs.Helsinki.FI>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:21:09 +0300 (EEST)
From: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
cc: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...cast.net>,
David Wilder <dwilder@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
systemtap-ml <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tzanussi@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] relayfs: support larger relay buffer take 2
Hi Masami,
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> +static struct page *relay_alloc_page_array(unsigned int n_pages)
> +{
> + struct page *array;
> + unsigned int pa_size = n_pages * sizeof(struct page *);
> +
> + if (pa_size > PAGE_SIZE) {
> + array = vmalloc(pa_size);
> + if (array)
> + memset(array, 0, pa_size);
> + } else {
> + array = kcalloc(n_pages, sizeof(struct page *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + }
> + return array;
> +}
I think it's bit confusing to have relay_alloc_page_array() return a
pointer to struct page as it's really allocating an _array_ of pointers to
struct page. So why not just use void * here as the kernel memory
allocators do?
> +static void relay_free_page_array(struct page *array)
> +{
> + if (is_vmalloc_addr(array))
> + vfree(array);
> + else
> + kfree(array);
> +}
Here as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists