[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48066EBE.3040608@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:25:18 -0700
From: David Wilder <dwilder@...ibm.com>
To: prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
hunt@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 1/1] debugfs_printk and debugfs_dump interface
K. Prasad wrote:
>
> +
> +struct debugfs_printk_data {
> + char *parent_dir;
> + char *dir;
> + int exists;
> + int buf_size;
> + int sub_buf_size;
> +};
How about adding a "flags" field here to hold the trace channel flags.
Pass the flags through to trace_setup(). This way the caller can
control the trace options.
Add a description of debugfs_printk() and debugfs_dump() to
Documentation/trace.txt.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists