lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080416233331.GA9225@Krystal>
Date:	Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:33:31 -0400
From:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 23/27] Immediate Values - Powerpc Optimization NMI
	MCE support

* Paul Mackerras (paulus@...ba.org) wrote:
> Mathieu Desnoyers writes:
> 
> > Use an atomic update for immediate values.
> 
> What is meant by an "atomic" update in this context?  AFAICS you are
> using memcpy, which is not in any way guaranteed to be atomic.
> 
> Paul.

I expect memcpy to perform the copy in one memory access, given I put a 

  .align 2

before the 2 bytes instruction. It makes sure the instruction modified
fits in a single, aligned, memory write.

Or maybe am I expecting too much from memcpy ?

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ