[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080416001816.GA26295@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 02:18:16 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Yinghai.Lu@....com,
apw@...dowen.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: sparsemem memory_present() memory corruption fix
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> finally found it ... the patch below solves the sparsemem crash and
> the testsystem boots up fine now:
>
> mars:~> uname -a
> Linux mars 2.6.25-rc9-sched-devel.git-x86-latest.git #985 SMP Wed Apr 16
> 01:37:37 CEST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
i re-checked the original SLAB config too and that boots fine as well
now - so i'm confident that the regression has been sufficiently cured.
it's getting quite late here (or rather, it's getting early :-/ ) so it
would be nice if others could double-check this calculation (with an eye
on all possible architectures):
+ unsigned long max_arch_pfn = 1ULL << (MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS-PAGE_SHIFT);
and also check my analysis whether it is correct and whether it matches
the reported bug patterns. But otherwise the fix looks like a safe fix
for v2.6.25-final to me - it only filters out values from sparsemem
input that are nonsensical in the sparsemem framework anyway.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists