[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f17812d70804160149q1fc694dtdff26e3650666c16@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:49:11 +0800
From: "eric miao" <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
To: "Peter Teoh" <htmldeveloper@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kernel Newbies" <kernelnewbies@...linux.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Self-snapshotting in Linux
Hibernation maybe ... try "echo "disk" > /sys/power/state"
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Peter Teoh <htmldeveloper@...il.com> wrote:
> Sorry if this is a a crazy idea.....just be forewarned....
>
> First, I would like to make a reference to VMWare's snapshot (name not
> important, emphasize the idea) feature - hopefully u are familiar with
> it. This is a feature whereby u can freeze the entire OS (kernel +
> userspace application running) and then later reload itself next time,
> continuing where it left off, without reboot from ground zero.
>
> Next, can I ask, is such a feature useful in Linux? Ie, able to
> restart the kernel + userspace application from where u left off, the
> last time round. Not JUST the normal suspend/resume feature, but
> more important able to CHOOSE among the different available images for
> u to resume on. Eg, u want to freeze the current 2.6.25-rc6 kernel,
> save it, and then restore back the 2.6.23-rc5 image, work on it, save
> it, and then restore the previous image again. All done without
> virtualization as in the VMWare sense - which really is CPU intensive
> and slow things down a lot. Now we can directly execute each OS
> kernel image on the CPU, and since saving and restoring is quite fast
> (eg, zipping up the entire physical memory before saving into
> permanent storage) - I supposed this will be much faster than the
> normal initialization/fsck work done normally....or did I missed out
> anything?
>
> Essentially, to reiterate the key idea: able to snapshot the current
> kernel+userspace permanent.....restore from another snapshot....and
> then switch back again if needed etc.....will the implementation be
> difficult...if not impossible????
>
> --
> Regards,
> Peter Teoh
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Cheers
- eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists