| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:48:02 +0100 From: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk> To: nigel@...el.suspend2.net CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: Self-snapshotting in Linux Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. > > On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 03:27 -0700, Alan Jenkins wrote: > >> I guess there is the hardware / drivers issue. I would like to claim >> I've found hibernation to be reliable but unfortunately that's not >> 100% true. As you say, that's inherent to snapshotting on >> unvirtualised hardware - calling it snapshotting instead of >> hibernation wouldn't change anything. >> > > On a particular set of hardware, it should be possible to make it 100% > reliable. If you've found bugs, please report them. We can only fix > issues if we know they exist. > Thanks! I already replied to Pavels similar comment - I had posted on Bugzilla. I guess it missed the right people because it started off in the wrong category. (The first symptom I reported was my 2.13Ghz cpu running at 1Ghz after a sucessful hibernation cycle). At Rafaels request, I shall be retesting with the latest 2.6.25-rc kernel on Saturday. I look forward to getting it fixed - I know it should be possible because it's a regression. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists