| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20080417021813.04df7912.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:18:13 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> Subject: Re: [v2.6.26] what's brewing in x86.git for v2.6.26 On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:06:26 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote: > > * Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > By keeping all this code out of -mm you haven't solved any of the > > merge/integration problems which we had in 2.6.24-rcX. They're all > > still there. All you did was to push them out of the two-month > > integrate-and-test period and put them into the 2.6.25 merge window > > instead. > > ... hm, i think there's really no problem here at all: most of the merge > problems you cited were due to clearly out-of-tree patches that sit in > x86.git/testing for the convenience of our testers and contributors, > that we have no intention to push upstream. Are those out-of-tree patches also in linux-next? The page-flags and prctl changes are there. And those are planned for 2.6.26, aren't they? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists