linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][patch 0/5] Bootmem fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080417183639.7d3831e0.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:36:39 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...urebad.de>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][patch 0/5] Bootmem fixes

On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:36:29 +0200
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...urebad.de> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> here are a bunch of fixes for the bootmem allocator.  These are tested
> on boring x86_32 UMA hardware, but 3 patches only show their effects
> on multi-node systems, so please review and test.
> 
> Only the first two patches are real code changes, the others are
> cleanups.
> 
> `Node-setup agnostic free_bootmem()' assumes that all bootmem
> descriptors describe contiguous regions and bdata_list is in ascending
> order.  Yinghai was unsure about this fact, Ingo could you ACK/NAK
> this?
> 
Tested on ia64/NUMA box  on 2.6.25. seems no problem.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/