[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080417023331.3350e217.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:33:31 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [v2.6.26] what's brewing in x86.git for v2.6.26
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:19:35 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:54:25 -0700
>
> > linux-next ramped up across the 2.6.25-rc window and I wanted to give it
> > some time to see how it would pan out.
> ...
> > I don't know what you mena by this. But linux-next integrates only the
> > other subsystem trees and they have rarely caused me integration problems
> > against git-net.
There are maybe as many as 100 "subsystem trees" hosted in -mm. Stuff like
md, ipmi, tty, elf, keys, procfs, char drivers, nbd, fbdev, aoe, fuse, edac
and the list goes on.
Once I get -mm based on linux-next, the next step is to somehow feed those
trees (well, the "stable" parts thereof) back into linux-next while not
losing track of all the patches. I haven't a clue how I'll do this ;)
But I haven't thought about it much yet.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists