[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080417031829.15ec73df.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:18:29 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [v2.6.26] what's brewing in x86.git for v2.6.26
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:11:36 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> >
> > Does it really really really need to consume one of our few remaining page
> > flags? We'll be in a mess when we run out.
>
> No we're not. Just the (imho always misguided) "encode zone/node number
> into flags" optimization has to be removed again or made 64bit only.
> Then there will be plenty of flags again.
hm. Or we add a new nid&zone field to the pageframe for 32bit NUMA. Just
don't tell Paul Mundt ;)
Need to work out what's going on with ia64's use of the upper 32 bits too.
I have a feeling it's using less than it used too but at 3AM I can't be
assed working it out.
> Really I see no real reason this can't be done with a small hash table
> again like x86-64 originally did.
How did that work? A pfn->zone-id hash table would be huge?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists